Total merit index: 2 | 03.06.2025 | |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Production |
100 |
|
 |
|
Milk-kg |
91 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
91 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
91 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
92 |
|
 |
|
Fat-% |
111 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
111 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
110 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
112 |
|
 |
|
Fat-kg |
100 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
99 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
99 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
101 |
|
 |
|
Prot.-% |
113 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
114 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
112 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
113 |
|
 |
|
Prot.kg |
97 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
97 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
96 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
98 |
|
 |
|
Persistency |
94 |
non-pers. |
 |
persistant |
|
Fertility |
99 |
|
 |
|
ICF |
103 |
|
 |
|
IFL (heifers) |
91 |
|
 |
|
IFL (cows) |
99 |
|
 |
|
AIS (heifers) |
95 |
|
 |
|
AIS (cows) |
101 |
|
 |
|
Conseption rate (heifers) |
100 |
|
 |
|
Conseption rate (cows) |
99 |
|
 |
|
Birth |
103 |
|
 |
|
Calving |
84 |
|
 |
|
Still birth sire |
104 |
|
 |
|
Still birth mgs |
91 |
|
 |
|
Calving ease (sire) |
105 |
|
 |
|
Calving ease (mgs) |
95 |
|
 |
|
NRR (male fertility, not NAV val.) |
|
|
 |
|
|
Growth |
110 |
|
 |
|
Slaughter weight |
115 |
|
 |
|
Carcass class |
97 |
|
 |
|
Fat class |
85 |
|
 |
|
|
Udder health |
105 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. (-15 - 50 d from calving) |
112 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. (51 - 300 d from calving) |
107 |
|
 |
|
2st lact. (-15 - 150 d from calving) |
102 |
|
 |
|
3st lact. (-15 - 150 d from calving) |
104 |
|
 |
|
Cell count |
114 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
110 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
112 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
113 |
|
 |
|
Milkability |
95 |
|
 |
|
Leakage |
97 |
|
 |
|
Other treatments |
103 |
|
 |
|
Early reproductive disorders |
101 |
|
 |
|
Late reproductive disorders |
97 |
|
 |
|
Metabolic diseases |
106 |
|
 |
|
Feet and leg problems |
95 |
|
 |
|
Temperament |
107 |
|
 |
|
Hoofhealth |
101 |
|
 |
|
Longevity |
103 |
bad |
 |
good |
Youngstock survival |
98 |
|
 |
|
Early period (heifers) |
100 |
|
 |
|
Late period (heifers) |
98 |
|
 |
|
Early period (young bulls) |
102 |
|
 |
|
Late period (young bulls) |
97 |
|
 |
|
Saved feed |
|
bad |
 |
good |
Maintenance efficiency |
|
|
 |
|
Metabolic efficiency |
|
|
 |
|
|
Conformation | |  | |
|
Frame |
103 |
|
 |
|
Stature |
102 |
short |
 |
tall |
Angularity |
100 |
coarse |
 |
angular |
Chest width |
110 |
narrow |
 |
wide |
Body depth |
110 |
shallow |
 |
deep |
Topline |
102 |
very weak |
 |
upwards |
Rump angle |
100 |
high pins |
 |
low pins |
Rump width |
97 |
narrow pins |
 |
wide pins |
|
Feet & Legs |
94 |
bad |
 |
good |
Rear legs rear view |
90 |
toes out |
 |
parallel, bow-legged |
HockQuality |
93 |
filled |
 |
dry |
BoneQuality |
99 |
coarse |
 |
fine and thin |
Rear legs side view |
100 |
straight |
 |
sickled |
Foot angle |
|
low |
 |
steep |
Hoof angle |
111 |
low |
 |
steep |
|
Udder conformation |
103 |
|
 |
|
Fore udder attachment |
108 |
loose |
 |
strong |
Fore teat length |
96 |
short (30 mm) |
 |
long (70 mm) |
TeatThickness |
93 |
thin (15 mm) |
 |
thick (31 mm) |
Udder balance |
111 |
deep rear udder |
 |
deep front udder |
Rear udder height |
90 |
low |
 |
high |
Rear attachment width |
95 |
narrow |
 |
wide |
Central ligament |
118 |
weak |
 |
strong |
Udder depth |
105 |
deep |
 |
high |
Rear teat placement |
119 |
wide |
 |
close |
Fore teat placement |
100 |
wide |
 |
close |