Total merit index: -11 | 01.04.2025 | |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Production |
95 |
|
 |
|
Milk-kg |
107 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
106 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
106 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
108 |
|
 |
|
Fat-% |
86 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
86 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
87 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
86 |
|
 |
|
Fat-kg |
95 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
95 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
95 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
96 |
|
 |
|
Prot.-% |
82 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
81 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
82 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
83 |
|
 |
|
Prot.kg |
99 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
98 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
98 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
99 |
|
 |
|
Persistency |
103 |
non-pers. |
 |
persistant |
|
Fertility |
117 |
|
 |
|
ICF |
125 |
|
 |
|
IFL (heifers) |
109 |
|
 |
|
IFL (cows) |
117 |
|
 |
|
AIS (heifers) |
106 |
|
 |
|
AIS (cows) |
108 |
|
 |
|
Conseption rate (heifers) |
107 |
|
 |
|
Conseption rate (cows) |
105 |
|
 |
|
Birth |
120 |
|
 |
|
Calving |
102 |
|
 |
|
Still birth sire |
121 |
|
 |
|
Still birth mgs |
102 |
|
 |
|
Calving ease (sire) |
117 |
|
 |
|
Calving ease (mgs) |
101 |
|
 |
|
NRR (male fertility, not NAV val.) |
|
|
 |
|
|
Growth |
108 |
|
 |
|
Slaughter weight |
100 |
|
 |
|
Carcass class |
125 |
|
 |
|
Fat class |
113 |
|
 |
|
|
Udder health |
65 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. (-15 - 50 d from calving) |
84 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. (51 - 300 d from calving) |
69 |
|
 |
|
2st lact. (-15 - 150 d from calving) |
69 |
|
 |
|
3st lact. (-15 - 150 d from calving) |
68 |
|
 |
|
Cell count |
71 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
72 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
76 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
75 |
|
 |
|
Milkability |
96 |
|
 |
|
Leakage |
94 |
|
 |
|
Other treatments |
105 |
|
 |
|
Early reproductive disorders |
104 |
|
 |
|
Late reproductive disorders |
111 |
|
 |
|
Metabolic diseases |
100 |
|
 |
|
Feet and leg problems |
101 |
|
 |
|
Temperament |
84 |
|
 |
|
Hoofhealth |
93 |
|
 |
|
Longevity |
|
bad |
 |
good |
Youngstock survival |
90 |
|
 |
|
Early period (heifers) |
98 |
|
 |
|
Late period (heifers) |
92 |
|
 |
|
Early period (young bulls) |
100 |
|
 |
|
Late period (young bulls) |
88 |
|
 |
|
Saved feed |
|
bad |
 |
good |
Maintenance efficiency |
|
|
 |
|
Metabolic efficiency |
|
|
 |
|
|
Conformation | |  | |
|
Frame |
98 |
|
 |
|
Stature |
94 |
short |
 |
tall |
Angularity |
105 |
coarse |
 |
angular |
Chest width |
111 |
narrow |
 |
wide |
Body depth |
118 |
shallow |
 |
deep |
Topline |
96 |
very weak |
 |
upwards |
Rump angle |
96 |
high pins |
 |
low pins |
Rump width |
92 |
narrow pins |
 |
wide pins |
|
Feet & Legs |
100 |
bad |
 |
good |
Rear legs rear view |
108 |
toes out |
 |
parallel, bow-legged |
HockQuality |
94 |
filled |
 |
dry |
BoneQuality |
85 |
coarse |
 |
fine and thin |
Rear legs side view |
94 |
straight |
 |
sickled |
Foot angle |
|
low |
 |
steep |
Hoof angle |
106 |
low |
 |
steep |
|
Udder conformation |
97 |
|
 |
|
Fore udder attachment |
97 |
loose |
 |
strong |
Fore teat length |
97 |
short (30 mm) |
 |
long (70 mm) |
TeatThickness |
120 |
thin (15 mm) |
 |
thick (31 mm) |
Udder balance |
102 |
deep rear udder |
 |
deep front udder |
Rear udder height |
100 |
low |
 |
high |
Rear attachment width |
97 |
narrow |
 |
wide |
Central ligament |
82 |
weak |
 |
strong |
Udder depth |
86 |
deep |
 |
high |
Rear teat placement |
100 |
wide |
 |
close |
Fore teat placement |
109 |
wide |
 |
close |