Total merit index: -12 | 01.04.2025 | |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Production |
89 |
|
 |
|
Milk-kg |
94 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
90 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
94 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
96 |
|
 |
|
Fat-% |
89 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
87 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
90 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
90 |
|
 |
|
Fat-kg |
89 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
86 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
89 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
90 |
|
 |
|
Prot.-% |
92 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
92 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
92 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
92 |
|
 |
|
Prot.kg |
92 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
89 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
92 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
93 |
|
 |
|
Persistency |
112 |
non-pers. |
 |
persistant |
|
Fertility |
105 |
|
 |
|
ICF |
102 |
|
 |
|
IFL (heifers) |
112 |
|
 |
|
IFL (cows) |
103 |
|
 |
|
AIS (heifers) |
112 |
|
 |
|
AIS (cows) |
104 |
|
 |
|
Conseption rate (heifers) |
110 |
|
 |
|
Conseption rate (cows) |
103 |
|
 |
|
Birth |
85 |
|
 |
|
Calving |
91 |
|
 |
|
Still birth sire |
85 |
|
 |
|
Still birth mgs |
88 |
|
 |
|
Calving ease (sire) |
78 |
|
 |
|
Calving ease (mgs) |
93 |
|
 |
|
NRR (male fertility, not NAV val.) |
|
|
 |
|
|
Growth |
104 |
|
 |
|
Slaughter weight |
98 |
|
 |
|
Carcass class |
114 |
|
 |
|
Fat class |
75 |
|
 |
|
|
Udder health |
102 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. (-15 - 50 d from calving) |
103 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. (51 - 300 d from calving) |
105 |
|
 |
|
2st lact. (-15 - 150 d from calving) |
102 |
|
 |
|
3st lact. (-15 - 150 d from calving) |
102 |
|
 |
|
Cell count |
112 |
|
 |
|
1st lact. |
109 |
|
 |
|
2nd lact. |
114 |
|
 |
|
3rd lact. |
110 |
|
 |
|
Milkability |
107 |
|
 |
|
Leakage |
105 |
|
 |
|
Other treatments |
91 |
|
 |
|
Early reproductive disorders |
96 |
|
 |
|
Late reproductive disorders |
93 |
|
 |
|
Metabolic diseases |
96 |
|
 |
|
Feet and leg problems |
99 |
|
 |
|
Temperament |
107 |
|
 |
|
Hoofhealth |
103 |
|
 |
|
Longevity |
94 |
bad |
 |
good |
Youngstock survival |
100 |
|
 |
|
Early period (heifers) |
101 |
|
 |
|
Late period (heifers) |
99 |
|
 |
|
Early period (young bulls) |
101 |
|
 |
|
Late period (young bulls) |
100 |
|
 |
|
Saved feed |
|
bad |
 |
good |
Maintenance efficiency |
|
|
 |
|
Metabolic efficiency |
|
|
 |
|
|
Conformation | |  | |
|
Frame |
87 |
|
 |
|
Stature |
79 |
short |
 |
tall |
Angularity |
99 |
coarse |
 |
angular |
Chest width |
114 |
narrow |
 |
wide |
Body depth |
99 |
shallow |
 |
deep |
Topline |
104 |
very weak |
 |
upwards |
Rump angle |
103 |
high pins |
 |
low pins |
Rump width |
87 |
narrow pins |
 |
wide pins |
|
Feet & Legs |
103 |
bad |
 |
good |
Rear legs rear view |
84 |
toes out |
 |
parallel, bow-legged |
HockQuality |
119 |
filled |
 |
dry |
BoneQuality |
117 |
coarse |
 |
fine and thin |
Rear legs side view |
110 |
straight |
 |
sickled |
Foot angle |
|
low |
 |
steep |
Hoof angle |
105 |
low |
 |
steep |
|
Udder conformation |
89 |
|
 |
|
Fore udder attachment |
102 |
loose |
 |
strong |
Fore teat length |
78 |
short (30 mm) |
 |
long (70 mm) |
TeatThickness |
81 |
thin (15 mm) |
 |
thick (31 mm) |
Udder balance |
97 |
deep rear udder |
 |
deep front udder |
Rear udder height |
85 |
low |
 |
high |
Rear attachment width |
85 |
narrow |
 |
wide |
Central ligament |
80 |
weak |
 |
strong |
Udder depth |
93 |
deep |
 |
high |
Rear teat placement |
84 |
wide |
 |
close |
Fore teat placement |
94 |
wide |
 |
close |